13 989
edycji
Inne3: Różnice pomiędzy wersjami
Przejdź do nawigacji
Przejdź do wyszukiwania
brak opisu edycji
(UWAGA! Usunięcie treści (strona pozostała pusta)!) Znaczniki: Ręczne wycofanie zmian Usunięcie całej zawartości strony |
Znacznik: Wycofane |
||
| Linia 1: | Linia 1: | ||
{{InfoCard | |||
|heading= | |||
<translate><!--T:2--> Advantages of wikis</translate> | |||
|content=<nowiki/> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:14--> Fewer impediments to division of labor:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:15--> Allows collaboration in which each person contributes one's knowledge and effort to improving mainspace pages, as opposed to each person posting one's own content that cannot be modified by others.</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:16--> Fast action on ideas community members come up with:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:17--> Wikis allow decentralized action, in which people can make decisions that are reviewed afterward, rather than seeking permission first from a central decision-maker, who can be a bottleneck.</translate> <translate><!--T:18--> A psychological component may be involved: users may be more likely to fix a problem if they get the relatively immediate gratification of seeing the results of their edit, than if they have to go through a process of reporting the problem to a central authority who may not act in a timely manner.</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:19--> Collaborative quality control:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:20--> If an editor makes a mistake on a wiki, someone else can correct it so that it does not continue being shown to readers and reflecting badly on the organization.</translate> <translate><!--T:21--> If the administrator of a non-wiki website makes a mistake, then it may go uncorrected and reflect badly on the organization.</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:22--> Searchable content:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:23--> Allows easy retrieval of archived information (as opposed to, say, Facebook, which buries old posts and threads in non-searchable archives).</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:24--> Charming quirkiness:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:25--> Some readers enjoy the slightly chaotic nature of wikis, in which the decentralized nature of the production process is sometimes exposed to view.</translate> <translate><!--T:26--> [[w:Sue Gardner|Sue Gardner]] viewed it as a feature rather than a bug that "Wikipedia has always been kind of a homely, awkward, handcrafted-looking site."</translate><ref>Garber, Megan (12 July 2012). [http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/on-the-ugliness-of-wikipedia/259747/ On the Ugliness of Wikipedia]. ''The Atlantic''.</ref> | |||
}} | |||
{{InfoCard | |||
|heading=<translate><!--T:3--> Disadvantages of wikis</translate> | |||
|content=<nowiki/> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:27--> Spam, vandalism, etc.:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:28--> Open editing (if that is what you use) renders the site vulnerable to spam, vandalism, and other unhelpful edits.</translate> <translate><!--T:29--> This makes it necessary for someone to review the recent changes regularly and undo bad edits.</translate> <translate><!--T:30--> See <tvar|1>{{ll|Manual:Combating spam}}</>.</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:31--> Bad edits may be at least briefly visible:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:32--> Even with people reviewing recent changes, there will be a lag between when bad edits are made and when they are reversed.</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:33--> Organizational reputation may suffer from users' actions:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:34--> The wiki content may be deemed to reflect on the organization as a whole rather than on the editors who made the changes.</translate> <translate><!--T:35--> This is different from the state of affairs that exists when, say, each user owns and administers a personal website which has one owner who is responsible for all content.</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:36--> New content may be presented in hard-to-read formats:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:37--> Readers looking for the newest content have the options of going to (1) a recent changes page, which may not present the new content in a format that is easy for them to quickly peruse and grasp the meaning of (since it's presented as diffs); (2) a list of new pages, some of which may not be high-quality because they are still under construction and/or haven't been reviewed yet; or (3) a list of pages that have been reviewed for quality (such as Wikipedia's [[w:Wikipedia:Did you know|did you know]]), whose curation may require extra labor.</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:38--> Diffusion of responsibility:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:39--> A wiki may remain empty or unattended as everyone is expecting others to make the necessary changes.</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:40--> Software that is relatively difficult to administer:</translate>''' <translate><!--T:41--> There are many blog installations and comparatively few wiki installations.</translate> <translate><!--T:42--> Therefore, a higher priority has been placed on making it easy to administer blogging software than has been the case with wiki software.</translate> | |||
*'''<translate><!--T:50--> Wikis primarily focus on text and media.</translate>''' <translate><!--T:51--> For managing data in a wiki, several approaches exist via extensions.</translate> <translate><!--T:52--> See <tvar|1>{{ll|Manual:Managing data in MediaWiki}}</>.</translate> | |||
}} | |||
}} | |||